|
|
|
Hundreds of highly compromising emails and documents have
been leaked
online from the Climatic Research
Unit University of East Anglia. The
emails provide evidence that climatologists
systematically
colluded in manipulating data to support the view that climate change
is real,
and is being caused by mankind.
The leaked emails
discuss
political pressure on scientists, statistical tricks how to hide
inconvenient
data, how to squeeze dissenting scientists out of the peer
reviews, how to
censor information going out to the public, how to decline requests
for
information under the Freedom of Information Act, how prevent
dissenting researchers from publishing in scientific journals, and how
to
boycott
journals who did.
|
|
Several
authors and recipients of the leaked emails have confirmed
their
veracity. The leak from the Climatic
Research
Unit calls into
question scientific methods and the results of several public climate
research
institutes worldwide. The
CRU at the
University of East Anglia
is
one of the world’s leading research centers
on climate change and
the
top source of temperature data worldwide.  It
played a key role in the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) fourth
Assessment Report, which is the scientific base of
policy negotiations at
the Copenhagen
Climate Conference next month.
The
IPCC spent
100.000.000 $ of public resources in funding reseachers to find
proof of man made global warming. The resulting IPCC
fourth
Assessment Report provided support for the UN policy to
mitigate
global
warming and for a further implementation of the Kyoto Protocol.
Proposals for a
new Copenhagen Climate Treaty including the much
disputed
Global Emissions Trading scheme were the policy response to the IPCC's
biased research results.
The
UN Cap-and-Trade CO2 reduction scheme has been widely
criticised for giving politicians state monopoly over the supply of a
virtual but indispensable commodity of CO2 allowances and for providing
politicians with another powerfull instrument to raise taxes most
discretely through industry.
 Economists
view the Cap
and Trade's arbitrary
allocation of CO2 allowances to countries, industries and
individual plants as
a
dangerous step
towards a centrally planned
economy. It would be a new
cash cow for the climate-industrial
complex of emissions traders and big business having access to the
right lobbyists. Britain's richest
man Lakshmi
Mittal recently
cashed £1
billion from excess ETS carbon permits attributed under the EU's arbitrary Emissions
Trading Scheme (Times). Both Al Gore and Rajendra
Pachauri (head of the IPCC) are reported
to have huge business interests in Carbon Trade. The
UN's similar cap-and trade sheme would allow politics to tax or
subsidise industries at wish. Many economists consider the Copenhagen
proposals as a power grab of politics on the market economy and as a
most serious restraint on the progress of Western as well as
develloping nations.
Michael Mann was Author of
the forged "hockey-stick
graph"
used by Al Gore and of
the
Climate Change report of
the UN
IPCC . He invented the "Nature
trick" of adding in real temps to
proxie data.
"It would be nice to try
to contain the putative
Medieval Warm Period"
Wed, 04 Jun 2003
|
The climate researchers have
always declined to share their data with
fellow scientists although sharing raw data with fellow scientists is
standard
procedure and the key to verifying research.
The general picture of the
series
of emails is one of conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data,
political pressures, manipulation of data and peer-reviews, possibly
illegal destruction
of
embarrassing information, and organized resistance to disclosure. They
produced
fraudulent research which the eco-industrial
complex has used to their own profit and which ecologists exploited for
their political agendas and to brainwash a
whole generation .
|
Phil
Jones headed Britain's
Centre for Climate Research.
He was at the centre of the biggest scientific scandal in history and
resigned from his post.
"If anything, I would like to see the climate change happen, so the
science could be proved right, regardless of the consequences".
July 5, 2005
|
 Phil
Jones says he has use Mann's "Nature trick of adding
in the real temps to each series"...to hide the decline". Real Climate
says "hiding" was an unfortunate turn of phrase.(0942777075)
- Michell Mann tells Jones that it would be nice to
'"contain" the
putative Medieval Warm Period'. (1054736277)
- Michael Mann discusses how to destroy a journal that has
published sceptic papers.(1047388489)
- Wigley discusses fixing an issue with sea surface
temperatures in the context of making the results look both warmer but
still plausible. (1254108338)
- Tim Osborn discusses how data are truncated to stop an
apparent cooling trend showing up in the results (0939154709).
Analysis of impact here.
Wow!
- Phil Jones encourages colleagues to delete information
subject to Freedom of Information request.(1212063122)
- Kevin Trenberth says they can't account for the lack of
recent warming and that it is a travesty that they can't.(1255352257)
- Funkhouser says he's pulled every trick up his sleeve to
milk his Kyrgistan series. Doesn't think it's productive to juggle the chronology
statistics any more than he has.(0843161829)
- Jones says he and Kevin will keep some papers out of the
next IPCC report.(1089318616)
- Santer says he will no longer publish in Royal Met Soc
journals if they enforce intermediate data being made available. Jones
has complained to head of Royal Met Soc about new editor of Weather
[why?data?] and has threatened to resign from RMS.(1237496573)
- Grant
Foster putting together a critical comment on a sceptic paper. Asks
for help for names of possible reviewers. Jones replies with a list of
people, telling Foster they know what to say about the paper and the
comment without any prompting.(1249503274)
- David Parker discussing the possibility of changing the
reference period for global temperature index. Thinks this shouldn't be
done because it confuses people and because it will make things look
less warm.(1105019698)
- An anonymous source says that robustness problems with
the Hockey Stick are known to anyone who understands his methodology. The source says that there will be a lot of
noise over McIntyre's 2003 paper and that knowing Mann's very thin skin
he will react strongly, unless he has learned from the past.(1067194064)
The
incident has been widely reported in Anglosaxon
media,
but
remained silenced in European mainstream media so far.
UPDATES
:
|
An overview of the arguments
Climategate versus Climatechange: click here
| The Road to Serfdom. This masterpiece of
Nobel Prize laureate Friedrich Hayek
is an eye-opener,
strongly advocating the free market principles. In this all-time
classic Hayek persuasively warns against the authoritarian utopias of
central planning and the welfare state. Fascism, communism and
socialism share these utopias. For the implementation of their plans
these authoritarian ideologies require government power over the
individual, inevitably leading to a totalitarian state. Every step away
from the free market toward planning reduces people's freedom and is a
step toward tyranny. Planning also cannot assess consumer preferences
with sufficient accuracy to efficiently co-ordinate production.
However in a free market, "Price" is the all-inclusive source of
information, guiding entrepreneurs to produce whatever is wanted and
directing workers wherever they are most needed. Free markets also
provide the entrepreneurial climate for a thriving economy and for
releasing the creative energy of its citizens. Free individuals in
their native strive to develop their talents and to improve their fate
produce spontaneous progress.
All public interference in the economic process disturbs the market
equilibrium, distorts the optimal allocation of resources and
consequently reduces the level of wealth. Where planning replaces free
markets people do not only loose their freedom and individuality.
Resulting slow
growth also increases welfare demands causing dependence similar to
slavery. In the end people's self-reliance and self-respect is ruined,
and citizens are degraded to a means to serve the ends of the
collective mass. |
Free condensed pdf Comments
Dutch
Abstract
Overview
Paperback
Version
Readers'
Digest
More Books of Friedrich
Hayek here |
 The
Tragedy of the commons by Garrett
Hardin Free
access
and unrestricted demand for a finite resource ultimately
dooms the resource through over-exploitation. This occurs
because the benefits of exploitation accrue to individuals,
each of which is motivated to maximise his or her own use of
the resource, while the costs of exploitation are
distributed between all those to whom the resource is
available (which may be a wider class of individuals than
those who are exploiting it). The theory itself is as old as
Aristotle who said: "That which is common to the greatest
number has the least care bestowed upon
it. more
here
|
 |
| Thank
You for Your visit - Don't forget to
bookmark - Thank You for linking http://workforall.net on
Your web Page |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
